Categories
Drama Movie Reviews Romance

Love Happens, A Misleading Title?

A mismatch of expectation?

Do bloggers know no bounds in what they write?  Do I know no bounds in what I write?  I am not sure if fellow bloggers have faced a similar situation.  At times, in a friendly catching up occasion, my friend would suddenly turn to me and ask, “You wouldn’t put that into your blog, would you?”  The dilemma of wanting some friends of mine to know – or not – that I have a website.

Of course I know the boundary.  And so, Mr. TK, if you are reading this, our little episode is safe with me.  Though we will likely to laugh over this for years to come.  And until I do the same thing you did, then we would laugh at each other for years to come.

Our band’s drummer wanted to watch that Michael Jackson film.  So I mobilized the Movie Review Squad in the morning.  TK suggested “The Hurt Locker”, a war film (which I promise to loop in another friend, Ng,  to watch).  Cynthia suggested “Love Happens”.  If it was up to me, I would love to pick “My Girlfriend Is An Agent”.  I love watching girls kicking asses.  In retrospect, I thought “Love Happens” is “NewYork, I Love You”.  Since all of us seemed happy about “Love Happens”, “Love Happens” it was.  (Still quite amazed that TK could decipher my morning SMS: Love happens today or tomorrow?)

I think the movie title “Love Happens” is misleading.  If it was to be branded not as a romance movie, it would have attracted lesser criticism just on the title itself.  I walked into the theater thinking it was another show, so obviously, I have little expectation on the outcome.  If we take away the notion of romance, and look at Jennifer Aniston’s role as helping Dr. Burke Ryan (played by the talented Aaron Eckart) – together with everyone in the workshop of how-to-get-over-the-loss-of-your-loved-ones hosted by Ryan – to come to terms with the loss of his wife, it is quite a decent movie to watch.  Some scenes are emotional.  Some are somewhat inspiriting (like taking the ‘stairs’ to see things in a different perspective).  The little word games Eckart and Aniston played onscreen makes the film interesting (to be honest, I know none of the three English words they use).  Cynthia and I have been a big fan of Aaron Eckart since the days of “Thank You For Smoking”.  And acting-wise, I think he delivers.

It is unrealistic – in my opinion – to expect a man to fall madly in love with another woman before he has even come to terms with the loss of his beloved partner three years ago on an accident that he blames himself upon.  In as such, the lack of the elements of romance or the presence of a glimpse of what is to come is only appropriate.  Unfortunately, the movie title and the excerpts suggest that “Love Happens” is a romance story.  Personally, I would prefer the filmmakers to use the title of “Brand New Day”, a variation of what the working title was.

Categories
Fantasy & Sci-fi Movie Reviews

The Dark Knight – Being the Rare One Who Cannot Connect to the New Bat Franchise

Erm.  Yawn?  Zzzz.

OK.  It is hard to write something knowing that over 90% of the population will disagree with.  And if I am to continue my ‘review career’, I have some serious recalibration to do.

Cynthia loves “The Dark Knight”; I had a headache watching it.  So what happens?  I will get to that in just a bit.

Great casting, no doubt.  The acting is rock solid especially from the late Heath Ledger and Aaron Eckhart.  Both I adore and respect a great deal.  Jack Nicholson’s Joker as far as I can remember is comical; Heath Ledger’s Joker is pure creepiness and madness.  Give Ledger his Oscar.  He deserves it.  Did Warner Bros. modify the ending to be sensitive to the circumstances?  I have no clue.  Warner Bros. did change the promotional campaign after Ledger’s death.

Just how much of the success of “The Dark Knight” is contributed by this unfortunate event?  I also have no clue.  What I do know is that I have done some serious reflection on why this film doesn’t quite work for me.

Maybe I am addicted to computer-generated imagery especially after that jaw dropping non-stop special effect of Hellboy II, “The Dark Knight” looks a bit bland to me.  I am not sure how most audience feels about the 153 minutes film.  But isn’t it a bit too, lengthy, with too many gaps of how-you-wish-there-was-more-entertainment-per-minute?

Sure I could overlook the above easily.  I love the Batman franchise.  I really do.  Probably one of my favorite superheroes.  If I close my eyes and think of Batman, I see a strong association to the flying bats, I see the bat cave, I see Batman sleeping upside down like a bat, I see a bat mobile with absolute sleekness, I see fast moving fights, I see a Gotham City so dark so thugs infested that induces fear, I see my heart leaps when Batman appears from nowhere, and I see myself living in a fantasy world captivated by its creator.  As I opened my eyes and watched “The Dark Knight” in a theater, I saw Batman making a rather unglamorous entrance, I saw Batman standing on top of the modern IFC building in my birth town Hong Kong (read: where is the fantasy when I know that the building was officially opened in 2003?) having absolutely no animalistic association to bats or whatsoever throughout the film, my heart sank.  If Batman was to stand on top of the Petronas Towers in Kuala Lumpur, I would have thought of the film “Entrapment”.  In fact, I did think of that film briefly while I was watching “The Dark Knight”.

And maybe I am still an old school when it comes to comic book adaptation.  I want to see frame-by-frame scenes composition; I want to see a rather simple storyline and I want to feel with and for my hero.  Anyways …

Having said all of the above, I can understand why “The Dark Knight” has a mass appeal.  Over 90% of the population loves this film, why wouldn’t you?  Can the gross revenue of “The Dark Knight” overtake the original “Batman” (1989) by Tim Burton?  Only time can tell.

OK.  I am done.  Back to my recalibration process.

Categories
Movie Reviews Romance

No Reservations – Zeta-Jones Oh Zeta-Jones

Dear friends. Sorry for the infrequent updates lately and infrequent visit to your sites. Life has been busy lately. Arrgghh! Good news, I have finally found time to watch “No Reservation” – quite possibly Catherine Zeta-Jones’s finest acting (not saying it is an Oscar wining performance). I have always enjoyed watching Catherine Zeta-Jones on screen. Her porcelain skin and irresistible mischievousness and her contribution to Ocean Twelve, Intolerable Cruelty, Chicago, America’s Sweethearts, and Zorro … just to name a few of my favorites. Gosh, I love her … on screen I mean.

In “No Reservation”, she plays the character of Kate Armstrong. A chef of a posh restaurant who is a control freak with frequent visits to her shrink and has total dedication to her craft. For a moment, I thought of Ratatouille like some others do. But to compare the rat Remy to the beautiful Catherine Zeta-Jones is just not … nice. Com’on guys.

As the story unfolds, Kate Armstrong finds herself having to take care of her niece (Abigail Breslin) after her sister has passed away. And here comes the charming chef assistance (Aaron Eckhart) who posts a threat – in Kate’s own mind – to her chef position. Worse still, this new assistance is sort of … charming. I am sure by now you can guess where this movie is heading towards.

I enjoy Aaron Eckhart’s acting a lot in “Thank You For Smoking”. What I did not realise is that how charming he can be on screen. My only complain is that his airtime in “No Reservation” is somewhat limited. Would have been good if he was to play a bigger role.

The little girl Abigail Breslin, 11 years of age, nominated for the Academy Award for her role in “Little Miss Sunshine”, in my humble opinion, is the gem of the entire film. Her acting is awesome. She out-acted Zeta-Jones by a few miles in my book (sorry Catherine). Abigail Breslin is a natural actress. I am confidence that she will do great on screen in time to come.

I love cooking and naturally, I enjoy the behind-the-kitchen scenes. It is rare to see on screen, I know. However, the storyline is somewhat predictable in the Hollywood sense. I can almost foresee what the next stage of the script was going to be. Forgettable storyline but not so forgettable acting.

Oh well, I agreed to watch “No Reservation” because of Catherine Zeta-Jones and Catherine Zeta-Jones only. Call me shallow but hey … I am a guy. One more thing, don’t expect to see Zeta-Jones in all beauty in “No Reservation”. She plays to her part that may not require her to look gorgeous and she does a good job out of it.